Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981200›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026

Penile vibratory stimulation as rehabilitation of erectile function following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: A quantitative pilot study.

Helene Reif Andersen, Alexander Bjørneboe Nolsøe, Emil Durukan, Peter Busch Østergren, Christian Fuglesang S Jensen, Jens Sønksen, Mikkel Fode

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helene Reif AndersenDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alexander Bjørneboe NolsøeDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emil DurukanDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-8944
Peter Busch ØstergrenDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4762-039X
Christian Fuglesang S JensenDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7810-1413
Jens SønksenDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel FodeDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. mikkel.mejlgaard.fode@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-4581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) has shown promise in aiding recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy. This prospective cohort pilot study aimed to determine optimized settings in preparation of a randomized controlled trial to further asses its effects. Men without prior erectile dysfunction were instructed to use a mechanical medical vibrator daily for six months following surgery and to adjust settings according to preferences. The primary objective was the optimized parameters defined by the time spent using the vibrator, along with the most frequently used amplitude and frequency settings. Secondary outcomes included patient acceptance and settings most often inducing erections and orgasms. Twenty men were included, 19 of whom used the device on a median of 40.1% of days (IQR: 28,8-51,4%). PVS was most often performed for 5 min (IQR: 5-10 min) and the most frequently used amplitude and frequency were 1 mm and 90 Hz. These parameters were also the ones to induce erections and orgasms most often. At 6 months, 12/19 men were able to engage in penetrative sex. Fourteen patients reported satisfaction with the device, and no adverse effects were observed. Altogether, patient-optimized parameters consisting of 5 min daily stimulation at an amplitude of 1 mm and a frequency of 90 Hz were the most used and showed the strongest association with both erections and orgasms. These parameters will be used in a larger randomized trial.

Identifiers

PMID41981200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.