ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026
Penile vibratory stimulation as rehabilitation of erectile function following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: A quantitative pilot study.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) has shown promise in aiding recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy. This prospective cohort pilot study aimed to determine optimized settings in preparation of a randomized controlled trial to further asses its effects. Men without prior erectile dysfunction were instructed to use a mechanical medical vibrator daily for six months following surgery and to adjust settings according to preferences. The primary objective was the optimized parameters defined by the time spent using the vibrator, along with the most frequently used amplitude and frequency settings. Secondary outcomes included patient acceptance and settings most often inducing erections and orgasms. Twenty men were included, 19 of whom used the device on a median of 40.1% of days (IQR: 28,8-51,4%). PVS was most often performed for 5 min (IQR: 5-10 min) and the most frequently used amplitude and frequency were 1 mm and 90 Hz. These parameters were also the ones to induce erections and orgasms most often. At 6 months, 12/19 men were able to engage in penetrative sex. Fourteen patients reported satisfaction with the device, and no adverse effects were observed. Altogether, patient-optimized parameters consisting of 5 min daily stimulation at an amplitude of 1 mm and a frequency of 90 Hz were the most used and showed the strongest association with both erections and orgasms. These parameters will be used in a larger randomized trial.
Identifiers
41981200What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.