ArticleScientific reports2026
An snRNA-seq aging clock for the fruit fly head sheds light on sex-biased aging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable Discovery of Natural Anti-Aging Bioactives from Food Resources: Current Status and Machine Learning Perspectives.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence as a catalyst in aging research: insights, gaps and future perspectives.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although multiple high-performing epigenetic aging clocks exist, few are based directly on gene expression. Such transcriptomic aging clocks allow us to identify potential age-associated genes directly. However, most existing transcriptomic clocks model a subset of genes and are limited in their ability to predict novel biomarkers. With the growing application of single-cell sequencing, there is a need for robust single-cell transcriptomic aging clocks. Moreover, aging clocks have yet to be applied to investigate the elusive phenomenon of sex differences in aging. We introduce TimeFlies, a pan-cell-type snRNA-seq aging clock for the Drosophila melanogaster head. TimeFlies uses deep learning to classify the donor age of cells based on genome-wide gene expression profiles. Using explainability methods, we identified key marker genes contributing to the classification, with lncRNAs showing up as highly enriched among predicted biomarkers. lncRNA:roX1 and lncRNA:roX2 are top clock genes across cell types. Both are regulators of X chromosome dosage compensation, a pathway previously found to be significantly affected by aging in the mouse brain. We validated these findings experimentally in Drosophila, showing a decrease in survival when dosage compensation is inhibited in vivo. Furthermore, we trained sex-specific TimeFlies clocks and noted significant differences in model predictions and explanations between male and female clocks, suggesting that different pathways drive aging in males and females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.