Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981179›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Unified spatial-temporal graph aggregation framework for predicting student performance.

Xian Yu, Yifen Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xian YuXinglin College, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Yifen ZhouMedical School, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China. zhouyifen@ntu.edu.cn.

Funding

General Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research in Jiangsu Colleges and Universities 2025SJYB1280Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province KYCX23_3396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of student performance is crucial for enabling timely interventions and supporting data-driven instructional strategies. Beyond single-term forecasts, it also facilitates early alerts and targeted feedback for learners and instructors. However, many existing models handle spatial relationships and temporal sequences independently, which limits their ability to capture the intricate dependencies embedded in academic data. In this study, we propose a unified spatial-temporal graph aggregation (USTGA) framework that embeds spatial similarity directly into temporal dependency modeling, forming a coherent and dynamically evolving graph representation. Unlike conventional architectures that treat spatial structure as static or auxiliary, the unified graph enables spatial relations to actively modulate temporal information propagation. To further enhance representation learning, an attention-guided aggregation strategy is employed to adaptively highlight informative spatial-temporal neighbors, while stacked aggregation layers progressively refine node representations across multiple scales. By jointly capturing fine-grained spatial-temporal interactions, the proposed framework overcomes limitations inherent in independent modeling strategies. Experiments on an educational dataset demonstrate that USTGA consistently outperforms competitive baselines, achieving reductions in multiple error metrics under repeated evaluations. The results confirm the framework's effectiveness and robustness, and its design offers high scalability and adaptability, making it well-suited for deployment in diverse educational analytics systems such as early-warning dashboards and program-level advising workflows.

Identifiers

PMID41981179
PMCPMC13237375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.