ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
A 2026 update on myelodysplastic neoplasms: current state, challenges and future directions.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ELN vs. IPSS-M in MDS/AML: Which Prognostic System Should Guide Clinical Decision-Making?Cancers · 2026Review
- Systemic Metabolic Changes in Plasma of Patients with Myelodysplastic Neoplasms and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Understanding the evolving role of early palliative care in myelodysplastic syndromes: a 2026 narrative review.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Quality and reliability of myelodysplastic syndromes-related health information on Chinese short-video platforms: a multi-platform cross-sectional analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic neoplasms, also known as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), are a heterogeneous group of myeloid malignancies characterized by ineffective haematopoiesis, cytopenias and a variably increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukaemia. MDS primarily affect older adults with a median age at diagnosis of 76 years among patients in the USA. Despite major advances in our understanding of the genetic landscape and pathophysiology of MDS over the past 20 years, few disease-modifying therapies have been approved. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only potentially curative option. This slow therapeutic progress likely reflects the complex and widely heterogeneous pathophysiology of MDS, including a multifaceted interplay of somatic and germline mutations, a dysfunctional immune system, and an inflamed bone marrow microenvironment. Despite improvements in diagnostic tools, classification systems and prognostic models, these changes have introduced challenges for clinical trial design and epidemiological reporting. In this Review, we provide an update on the epidemiology, diagnosis, risk stratification, classification and expanding therapeutic armamentarium for the management of MDS. We also provide an overview of the current challenges to further progress and discuss future directions of research, which will hopefully lead to the development and approval of novel and effective therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41981151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.