Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981151›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026

A 2026 update on myelodysplastic neoplasms: current state, challenges and future directions.

Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Alain Mina, Maximilian Stahl, Amer M Zeidan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan Philipp Bewersdorf *Section of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3352-0902
Alain Mina *Section of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Maximilian StahlSection of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Amer M ZeidanSection of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. amer.zeidan@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-8160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelodysplastic neoplasms, also known as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), are a heterogeneous group of myeloid malignancies characterized by ineffective haematopoiesis, cytopenias and a variably increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukaemia. MDS primarily affect older adults with a median age at diagnosis of 76 years among patients in the USA. Despite major advances in our understanding of the genetic landscape and pathophysiology of MDS over the past 20 years, few disease-modifying therapies have been approved. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only potentially curative option. This slow therapeutic progress likely reflects the complex and widely heterogeneous pathophysiology of MDS, including a multifaceted interplay of somatic and germline mutations, a dysfunctional immune system, and an inflamed bone marrow microenvironment. Despite improvements in diagnostic tools, classification systems and prognostic models, these changes have introduced challenges for clinical trial design and epidemiological reporting. In this Review, we provide an update on the epidemiology, diagnosis, risk stratification, classification and expanding therapeutic armamentarium for the management of MDS. We also provide an overview of the current challenges to further progress and discuss future directions of research, which will hopefully lead to the development and approval of novel and effective therapies.

Indexed as

Myelodysplastic SyndromesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.