Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981117›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Unveiling enhanced HCN sensing: a comparative DFT study on reactivity and sensitivity of X-doped biphenylene nanotubes (X = B, Al, and Ga).

Mohammadreza Hosseini, Sona Bajelan, Nasrin Delfan, Eghbal Omari, Atena Pakzadiyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammadreza HosseiniPhysical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Sona BajelanDepartment of Chemistry, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, P.O. Box 16315-1618, Tehran, 15418, Iran.
Nasrin DelfanDepartment of Chemistry, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, P.O. Box 16315-1618, Tehran, 15418, Iran.
Eghbal OmariDepartment of Chemistry, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, P.O. Box 16315-1618, Tehran, 15418, Iran.
Atena PakzadiyanDepartment of Chemistry, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, P.O. Box 16315-1618, Tehran, 15418, Iran. a.pakzadiyan@email.kntu.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rational design of sensing materials is essential for developing high‑performance detectors for hazardous gases. In this work, density functional theory (DFT) is employed to assess B‑, Al‑, and Ga‑doped biphenylene nanotubes (BPNTs) for hydrogen cyanide (HCN) detection. Pristine BPNT shows minimal interaction with HCN, with an adsorption energy of - 0.12 eV, negligible charge transfer, and non‑spontaneous adsorption. Doping significantly strengthens the interaction, producing adsorption energies stronger than - 1 eV and markedly enhanced charge transfer, indicative of spontaneous and robust adsorption. The results from our systematic study indicate that the nitrogen lone pair and the C-N π bond in hydrogen cyanide are the dominant charge-donating electronic states toward the defective nanotubes. The doped systems also exhibit improved sensing characteristics, including an energy‑gap reduction of approximately 9% and short predicted recovery times. Complementary analyses-ELF, NBO, and IRI-were performed to further justify the interaction mechanisms and confirm the formation of active sites upon doping. Overall, the results identify defective BPNTs as promising candidates for next‑generation HCN gas sensors.

Indexed as

Biphenylene nanotubesDFTGas sensorsHCN sensorsIRI analysisNBO approach

Identifiers

PMID41981117
PMCPMC13237180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.