ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantitative model for imaging single fiber reflectance spectroscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scattering properties of Intralipid modeled using dependent scattering theory.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-fiber reflectance (SFR) spectroscopy enables quantitative retrieval of tissue optical properties from highly localized measurements through a single multimode fiber, but its diagnostic yield can be limited by small sampling volumes and probe-pressure artifacts. Imaging SFR (iSFR) mitigates these issues by enabling contact-free, point-scanning spectral imaging using optics to project the fiber’s illumination–collection cone onto the tissue surface. We present a quantitative model tailored to iSFR that supports inverse retrieval of tissue absorption and scattering properties from reflectance spectra. The model is based on large-scale Monte Carlo simulations using a generalizable reflectance computation that replaces explicit simulation of arbitrary finite source–detector configurations with a distance-based probability weighting, substantially reducing computational cost. Across broad optical and geometric ranges, the iSFR model predicts reflectance with a median error of 6.2% (SFR: 4.2%). In inverse mode, using wavelength parameterizations for optical properties, the approach recovered absorption and scattering coefficients to within approximately 10% over a wide range of added noise for simulated spectra from two simplified tissue models, serving as a proof-of-concept. These results establish a quantitative model and an efficient computational pipeline for (i)SFR spectroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.