ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Evaluating real-world deployment of an HL7-CDA-aligned LLM for ICD-10-CM coding.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable ICD-10-CM coding remains a major operational burden in hospitals, and the real-world performance of AI systems for this task is poorly understood. We developed and deployed a modular, clinically grounded pipeline that combines principled base-model selection, redundancy-aware training, and HL7-aligned section prompts to support scalable ICD-10-CM coding across heterogeneous documentation environments. Using pairwise LLM-as-judge evaluation and Plackett-Luce ranking, BioMistral was identified as a high-performing foundation model and demonstrated consistent performance across two institutions. In a 13-week human-in-the-loop randomized controlled trial involving ten certified coding specialists, AI-assisted workflows significantly reduced coding time while maintaining accuracy. Satisfaction varied by experience, certification, and generational cohort, underscoring the importance of human factors in workflow integration. Importantly, our findings clarify that successful AI adoption operates across multiple levels-including documentation infrastructure, workflow uptake, and individual user acceptance-highlighting why model accuracy alone is insufficient to ensure real-world impact. These results provide real-world evidence that methodologically grounded, structurally informed LLM systems can achieve robust, equitable, and operationally meaningful performance in clinical documentation workflows.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.