ArticleScientific reports2026
Tea-inspired curing modulates chemical composition, volatile aroma, and sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Curing largely determines the usability and style of tobacco. Drawing on tea processing, we developed three methods using fresh tobacco leaves: a black tea-like process with wilting, rolling, fermentation, and drying (TR), and two green tea key steps that replace rolling with steaming (TZ) or pan-firing (TC) to shape distinct aroma styles, and these were compared with conventional flue-curing (CK). Sensory quality was evaluated by a trained panel and an electronic nose (E-nose). Enzyme activities, macromolecular constituents, major chemical components, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were systematically analyzed. The results showed that TR achieved the highest overall sensory performance, with CK and TC comparable, and TZ the lowest. E-nose patterns clearly discriminated the treatments and covaried with aroma scores, reflecting differences in aroma style. Enzymatic reactions induced by TR processing led to a marked decrease in polyphenols, while facilitating macromolecular degradation and promoting the accumulation of key VOCs, including phenylacetaldehyde, indole, and 4,7,9-megastigmatrien-3-one. In contrast, high-temperature pretreatments in TZ and TC rapidly inactivated enzymes before fermentation, leading to higher polyphenol retention but limited macromolecular degradation and key aroma development. Overall, macromolecules are primary negative drivers of sensory quality, whereas chemical balance and key aroma constituents support higher scores. These results indicate that targeted manipulation of key processing steps can effectively direct the formation of tobacco quality and flavor differentiation, while potentially regulating the formation of certain undesirable components. This study provides valuable support for advancing diversified tobacco-curing methods and generating tobacco leaf materials with distinct flavor profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.