ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid framework for robust runoff forecasting via decomposition and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate runoff forecasting is essential for flood control and water resource management, yet strong nonlinearity and seasonal non-stationarity often limit traditional models. This study proposes a hybrid decomposition-integration-optimization framework (TVFEMD-LSSVM-BiLSTM-FSS-IBKA), integrating time-variant filter empirical mode decomposition (TVFEMD), least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), flood season segmentation (FSS), and an improved black kite algorithm (IBKA). TVFEMD mitigates noise and non-stationarity, LSSVM and BiLSTM capture nonlinear and temporal features, FSS distinguishes seasonal hydrological regimes, and IBKA adaptively optimizes ensemble weights. Using daily runoff data from Shebu and Dongjiang stations, the proposed model reduces RMSE by 42.5% and 39.8%, respectively, compared with the best benchmark, with KGE improvements up to 27.2%. The framework effectively captures flood peaks and maintains stability during non-flood periods, avoiding prediction lag and underestimation. Overall, the proposed model demonstrates strong accuracy, robustness, and applicability for runoff forecasting under complex hydrological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.