Trial reportCommunications biology2026
The functional neuroanatomy of event-based and time-based prospective memory, and its improvement.
Trial report in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The functional neuroanatomy of event-based and time-based prospective memory, and its improvement.Communications biology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prospective memory anchors upcoming activities in future time and space either cued externally (event-based prospective memory) or internally (time-based prospective memory). It is key to remain autonomous and can be enhanced using incentives. To examine the neuronal underpinnings of prospective memory and any performance improvement, we randomly assigned 58 healthy older participants (60-75 years old, 36 women) to time-based and focal event-based prospective memory tasks using 7T-fMRI, with or without incentives. Event-based and time-based prospective memory differ in their functional neuroanatomy. The focal event-based task required activity important for the perception of relevant changes in the environment and for adapting the focus of attention to then respond swiftly. The time-based task, in contrast, involved regions supporting cognitive control or serving as a multimodal information buffer. Incentives had no effect in time-based prospective memory but recruited brain regions important for attention thus improving cue recognition in event-based prospective memory. This highlights the differences between these two prospective memory types and the need for differential approaches depending on the type of memory demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.