Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981065›Full record

Trial reportCommunications biology2026

The functional neuroanatomy of event-based and time-based prospective memory, and its improvement.

Jessica Peter, Marta Menéndez-Granda, Nadine Schmidt, Nathanael Jost, Katharina Klink, Yosuke Morishima, Sina Straub, Sebastian Horn, Matthias Kliegel, Michael Orth

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessica Peter *University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. jessica.peter@unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0817-8431
Marta Menéndez-Granda *University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Nadine SchmidtUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Nathanael JostUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Katharina KlinkUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Yosuke MorishimaTranslational Research Centre, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sina StraubUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9167-8778
Sebastian HornDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias KliegelFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michael OrthUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective memory anchors upcoming activities in future time and space either cued externally (event-based prospective memory) or internally (time-based prospective memory). It is key to remain autonomous and can be enhanced using incentives. To examine the neuronal underpinnings of prospective memory and any performance improvement, we randomly assigned 58 healthy older participants (60-75 years old, 36 women) to time-based and focal event-based prospective memory tasks using 7T-fMRI, with or without incentives. Event-based and time-based prospective memory differ in their functional neuroanatomy. The focal event-based task required activity important for the perception of relevant changes in the environment and for adapting the focus of attention to then respond swiftly. The time-based task, in contrast, involved regions supporting cognitive control or serving as a multimodal information buffer. Incentives had no effect in time-based prospective memory but recruited brain regions important for attention thus improving cue recognition in event-based prospective memory. This highlights the differences between these two prospective memory types and the need for differential approaches depending on the type of memory demand.

Indexed as

BrainMemory, EpisodicAgedBrain MappingCuesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41981065
PMCPMC13269919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.