Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981057›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Investigating performance and key factors for real-world deployment of grain image classification using convolutional neural networks.

Rani Kumari, Jonas Persson, Veronica Ehrström Eklöf, Moa Källgren, Ida-Maria Sintorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rani KumariDepartment of Information and Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. rkd.bit@gmail.com.
Jonas PerssonCGrain AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Veronica Ehrström EklöfCGrain AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Moa KällgrenCGrain AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ida-Maria SintornDepartment of Information and Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. ida.sintorn@it.uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and efficient grain quality assessment is critical for making informed decisions throughout the grain value chain. Early detection of disease enables actions to mitigate spread and further damage, and optimal batch mixing to fulfill specified quality requirements allows for maximizing value and minimizing scrapping. Vision based machine learning and deep learning approaches are gaining attention in the agricultural sector and are useful for the development of automated grain quality assessment. These techniques can reduce the current manual inspection load and are key for objective and precise analysis. Yet, the majority of prior studies are constrained to small or controlled and curated datasets. Practical challenges associated with real-world deployment and reliability are rarely addressed. That is the focus of this work. We present and demonstrate a structured approach for investigating convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and key factors influencing performance for wheat kernel classification. The objective is to determine a CNN model that ensures high and robust classification accuracy, while elucidating and explaining how different image dataset characteristics and training parameters affect performance and reliability. We use a commercial mirror-based imaging system that captures over 90% of each kernel's surface and contrast and compare model architectures, robustness, the effect on pre-processing and image resolution. Our results show similar and high overall performance for ResNet50V2 and EfficientNetV2B0 ([Formula: see text]% accuracy), but per-class analysis indicate that the smaller classes suffer from lack of representative examples, and that most classes benefit from pre-processing including downsampling whereas others benefit from higher resolution. Interactive visualizations reveal that another contributing factor is dubious annotation and multi-class belongingness. Thus, our step-by-step analysis of CNN performance underscores the need for representative data, proper pre-processing, and class-aware evaluation to ensure trustworthy deployment in wheat grain quality assessment.

Indexed as

Edible GrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTriticumClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsClass imbalanceConvolutional neural networks (CNN)Deep learningImage classificationUniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP)Wheat grain quality assessment

Identifiers

PMID41981057
PMCPMC13079808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.