Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981029›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The impact of wrist flexion on task performance and compensatory movements in transradial prosthesis users.

Laura A Miller, Quinn A Boser, Vikram Darbhe, Kristi L Turner, Jacqueline S Hebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura A MillerCenter for Bionic Medicine, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA. lmiller1@sralab.org.
Quinn A BoserUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Vikram DarbheCenter for Bionic Medicine, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kristi L TurnerCenter for Bionic Medicine, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jacqueline S HebertUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs W81XWH1910863NIH HHS 5R01HD094861-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper-limb prosthetic technology has advanced in recent years, yet most commercially available prosthetic wrists offer only a single active degree of freedom (DOF), typically rotation, with few providing powered flexion/extension. This limitation often forces users to compensate with proximal joints, leading to unnatural movements and potential overuse injuries. Despite user demand for improved wrist movement, few powered wrist options exist, and current outcome measures rarely quantify compensatory strategies directly. To address this gap, the Gaze and Movement Assessment (GaMA) metric was used to evaluate task performance and compensatory movements in five adults with unilateral transradial limb absence, fitted with a custom 2-DOF powered wrist. Participants completed the GaMA Tasks and functional outcomes under two conditions: with and without wrist flexion/extension. Results showed that, though individual variability was high, enabling wrist flexion/extension was seen to reduce some compensatory trunk and shoulder movements towards normative data. These findings suggest that powered wrist flexion/extension may support more normative movement patterns and highlight the importance of individualized prosthetic training. Future work should focus on targeted rehabilitation strategies to minimize compensatory movements as device complexity increases.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsWristWrist JointAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41981029
PMCPMC13237391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.