ArticleScientific reports2026
Tribological performance of mechanical face seals for Martian applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the tribological performance of dry-running mechanical face seals composed of a graphite rotating ring and a silicon carbide stationary ring under varying contact pressure conditions from 0.23 to 0.83 MPa), both in clean operation and in the presence of a Martian regolith simulant (MGS-1, PR < 80 μm). Three preload levels were applied: zero preload (SP0), nominal preload (SP1), and double preload (SP2), based on a calibrated spring characteristic and contact area analysis. Under clean conditions, increasing preload elevated frictional torque from ~ 0.017 Nm (SP0) to ~ 0.030 Nm (SP1) and ~ 0.070 Nm (SP2), indicating a direct correlation between contact pressure and interfacial shear. When MGS-1 regolith simulant was introduced, torque increased significantly in all configurations, reaching ~ 0.064 Nm (SP0MGS-1), ~ 0.082 Nm (SP1MGS-1), and ~ 0.095 Nm (SP2MGS-1). Real-time monitoring of torque and axial force enabled the calculation of dynamic friction forces and coefficients of friction, which revealed that contact pressure strongly influenced wear mechanisms: higher contact pressure enhanced interface conformity but accelerated abrasive degradation, while lower contact pressure reduced wear at the expense of sealing pressure. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed the presence of abrasive grooves and embedded particles exclusively on the graphite ring, with no perceivable damage on the SiC counterface. The results demonstrate that nominal contact pressure (SP1) provides the most favorable balance between friction stability, wear resistance, and sealing reliability, offering valuable insights for the design of mechanical seals in particulate-laden environments such as Martian surface operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.