ArticleScientific reports2026
A similarity-based predictive scheduling method for dynamic electric vehicle charging load management.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-time energy management at public electric vehicle (EV) parking lots is a complex challenge that involves the distribution grid stability considering user demand uncertainties. This paper develops a multi-stage, data-driven control framework that focuses on both load profile smoothing and ensuring user constraints such as desired charge level at departure. In this regard, the proposed algorithm tries to overcome the limitations of classical methods by integrating three layers: historical similarity-based prediction, dynamic predictive optimization with a genetic algorithm, and a final repair stage. Comprehensive evaluations of different stochastic scenarios ensure the operational robustness of this algorithm. Peak-to-average ratio (PAR) of the entire network is reduced by shifting load from nighttime peak hours to off-peak hours. This performance, which has a high convergence with the global optimal state, demonstrates the system's effectiveness in peak shaving and valley filling strategies. Additionally, the system has prevented destructive stresses on the transformers by limiting the maximum load ramp rate. Final repair mechanism ensures final state of charge (SoC) error for all EVs to below 0.1% on the user side. Ultimately, with an average processing time of a few seconds and a 35% reduction in charging pile occupancy, this method acts as a real-time solution that enhances network resilience while postponing the need for heavy investments in physical infrastructure development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.