ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrated computational screening of FDA-approved anticancer drugs as novel HPV-16 E6 inhibitors in cervical cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer, predominantly induced by high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) strains, remains a significant global health burden despite advancements in cancer therapeutics. Among viral oncoproteins, the HPV-16 E6 protein plays a pivotal role in carcinogenesis by targeting tumor suppressor pathways, making it an attractive therapeutic target. This study introduces an integrated computational framework for systematically repurposing FDA-approved anticancer drugs as potential E6 inhibitors. A library of 100 anticancer drugs was screened using machine learning models, with Gradient Boosting achieving optimal predictive performance (MCC = 1.0, AUC = 1.0), identifying 21 promising candidates. Molecular docking analyses further prioritized five lead compounds—Axitinib, Cabozantinib, Tivozanib, Deflazacort, and Cilostazol—with strong binding affinities (-8.13 to -9.24 kcal/mol) to the E6 protein. Quantum chemical calculations provided insights into the electronic properties and structure-activity relationships of these compounds, underscoring their potential inhibitory mechanisms. This study highlights the power of machine learning-driven approaches in drug discovery. It identifies clinically approved candidates for further experimental validation as HPV-16 E6 inhibitors, paving the way for innovative therapeutic strategies in HPV-associated malignancies. However, as the findings are based on computational screening, further in vitro and in vivo validation is required to confirm the inhibitory potential of the identified compounds against HPV-16 E6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.