ArticleScientific reports2026
An interpretable piecewise model for human mortality: the Christopher-Samba model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modelling mortality schedules has a long history in demographic research, with many models developed over time. This study proposes a new mortality model—the Christopher–Samba (C–S) model—that captures mortality patterns across the entire age spectrum. The proposed piecewise model integrates two components: The first part is an exponential function describing mortality up to age 5, while the second part focuses on mortality above age 5. The parameters of the second component, a reparametrized version of the classical logistic model, reflect the ages at which the annual probability of death reaches 1% and 10%, representing the benchmark ages for the onset of increased mortality and severe mortality, respectively. These thresholds naturally vary across populations. Mortality data from the Human Mortality Database were used to demonstrate the application of the proposed C–S model. The C–S model fits well across countries with diverse mortality schedules. Fitted parameters reveal substantial variation in the ages at which the annual probability of death reaches 1% and 10%, underscoring population differences in mortality dynamics. In summary, with its simplicity, strong fit, and meaningful parameter interpretations, the proposed C–S model is a valuable addition to mortality modelling literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.