ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2026
Deep Learning-Based Tumor Cell Classification in Lung Adenocarcinoma With a Case-by-Case Human-in-the-Loop Approach.
Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning networks trained for classification of single cells in hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) sections are limited in accuracy. We hypothesize the accuracy of a pathologist to be 98%-100%. Digital classification should be on par with this to be relevant. Here is presented a human-in-the-loop approach, where cell classification is fine-tuned by the pathologist during microscopy. The approach was established and tested on H&E-stained histological slides of pulmonary adenocarcinomas (LUADs). Networks pretrained on a limited selection of typical cells reached an average true positive rate (TPR) of 0.989 for classification of LUAD tumor cells within a high-power field (HPF), with 20 additional tumor cells included from the tumor investigated. Results were consistent on three HPFs, yielding means of Dice = 0.991, TPR = 0.987, precision = 0.996, and specificity = 0.988. Networks trained and tested on a smaller dataset of LUADs from The Cancer Genome Atlas demonstrated means of Dice = 0.951, TPR = 0.944, precision = 0.96, and specificity = 0.951. Classification of LUAD tumor cells by networks based and tested on data from the same source is comparable to that of a pathologist. The output is interpretable, validatable, and applicable in routine pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.