Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41980520›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2026

Steering generative models for protein design: Aligning and conditioning strategies.

Filippo Stocco, Michele Garibbo, Noelia Ferruz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Applications and limitations of AI tools in enzyme design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filippo StoccoCentre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Michele GaribboCentre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Noelia FerruzCentre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: noelia.ferruz@crg.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence models learn probability distributions from data and produce novel samples that capture the salient properties of their training sets. Proteins are particularly attractive for such approaches given their abundant data and the versatility of their representations, ranging from sequences to structures and functions. This versatility has motivated the rapid development of generative models for protein design, enabling the generation of functional proteins and enzymes with unprecedented success. However, because these models mirror their training distribution, they tend to sample from its most probable modes, while low-probability regions, often encoding valuable properties, remain underexplored. To address this challenge, recent work has proposed strategies for steering generative models toward user-specified properties. In this review, we survey and categorize these strategies, distinguishing approaches that modify model parameters, such as reinforcement learning or supervised fine-tuning, from those that keep the model's parameters fixed, including conditional generation, retrieval-augmented strategies, Bayesian guidance, and tailored sampling methods. Together, these developments are beginning to enable the steering of generative models toward proteins with desired properties.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein EngineeringProteinsBayes TheoremGenerative Artificial IntelligenceProteins

Identifiers

PMID41980520
PMCPMC13276615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.