Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41980480›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2026

Blood-based biomarker discovery for early pregnancy loss using integrative multi-omics strategies.

Yue Shi, Yongkang Yang, Xianghao Guo, Shuai Shi, Qin Li, Chi Chiu Wang, Liona C Poon, Pui Wah Chung, Jianan Xia, Yong Fei Wang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yue ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Yongkang YangThe Second Clinical Medical College, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Xianghao GuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Shuai ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Qin LiThe Second Clinical Medical College, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Chi Chiu WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Liona C PoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Pui Wah ChungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Jianan XiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Yong Fei WangSchool of Medicine, Warshel Institute for Computational Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Xingqiang LaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Institute, Shenzhen Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yueqiong NiState Key Laboratory of Metabolic Dysregulation and Prevention and Treatment of Esophageal Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: bernard_ni@sjtu.edu.cn.
Xiaoyan ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Institute, Shenzhen Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: chenxiaoyan@cuhk.edu.hk.
Yao WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR. Electronic address: yaowang1@cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly pregnancy loss (EPL), a spontaneous death of the embryo or foetus occurring within the first trimester, is a major challenge for human reproduction with profound adverse consequences for women's health. Currently, reliable blood-based biomarkers for EPL remain limited. Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover novel biomarkers for EPL using a multi-omics-based approach to facilitate early detection and timely management.

methodsIn the discovery cohort, 40 patients with EPL and 40 healthy pregnancies (HP) at 7-13 weeks of gestation were enrolled. Serum proteins and metabolites were assayed by Olink® technology and ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), respectively. Biomarkers were defined by false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and fold change (FC) > 1.2. Random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR) models incorporating selected biomarkers were employed to develop diagnostic models for EPL. In the external validation cohort, we prospectively enrolled 142 pregnancies at 7-10 gestational weeks, including 47 subjects who subsequently developed EPL and 95 pregnancies with full-term birth. Serum levels of selected biomarkers were quantified by ELISA.

findingsThe combined proteomics and metabolomics screening identified 26 proteins and 21 metabolites significantly changed in the EPL group and tightly associated with EPL-related clinical phenotypes, with functional enrichment in immunoregulation and lipid oxidation processes. Moreover, integrating serum levels of angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), neutrophil%, and lymphocyte% achieved an AUC of 0.944 (95% CI: 0.835-1.000) in the random forest model and 0.954 (95% CI: 0.875-1.000) in the logistic regression model to discriminate EPL from HP. Importantly, this four-biomarker model achieved an AUC of 0.857 (95% CI: 0.747-0.968) in the random survival forest model and a C-index of 0.804 (95% CI: 0.685-0.973) in the validation cohort for EPL prediction.

interpretationOur integrative omics study reveals a panel of potential circulating biomarkers for EPL, which further offer mechanistic insights into EPL pathogenesis, including impaired maternal immune tolerance and dysregulated lipid metabolism pathways. Moreover, the newly identified biomarkers exhibit promising diagnostic and predictive performance for EPL, underscoring its clinical translational value for human reproduction and maternal-foetal health.

fundingThis study was supported by Research Grants Council (RGC) Germany/Hong Kong Joint Research Scheme (G-CUHK415/25), 1+1+1 CUHK-CUHK(SZ)-GDST Joint Collaboration Fund (2025A0505000077), CUHK HOPE BWCH Collaborative Medical Research Fund (CF2025002), Shenzhen Medical Research Fund (C2501040), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (RCYX20210609104608036).

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousBiomarkersMetabolomicsAdultFemaleHumansMultiomicsPregnancyProteomicsROC CurveTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkersANGPTL4Early pregnancy lossIntegrative analysisMetabolomicsMiscarriageMulti-omicsPD-L1Proteomics

Identifiers

PMID41980480
PMCPMC13092690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.