ArticleInvestigacion y educacion en enfermeria2026
"Autonomy & Management in Prison Nursing". Development and validation of a mobile application.
Article in Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the process of development and validation of the content and semantics of the "Autonomy & Management in Prison Nursing" application for nurses working in prison units in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Methods: This methodological study employed the Contextualized Instructional Design method, following its four recommended stages: analysis, design and development, implementation, and evaluation. In the first phase, 164 nursing professionals participated by completing a semi-structured questionnaire addressing working conditions and professional autonomy. In the second phase, the application was developed with the support of an information technology professional. The third phase consisted of configuring and making the application available. Finally, in the fourth phase, content validation was carried out by 23 specialized judges and semantic validation by 51 nurses. Results: The content validation of the application was satisfactory, as all indicators - total agreement rate, Content Validity Index (0.962; p<0.01), and overall Cronbach's Alpha coefficient (0.969) - reached satisfactory levels. Semantic validation was also satisfactory, as all Cronbach's Alpha coefficients achieved high values, indicating correlation among the items and excellent reliability of the application. Conclusion: The "Autonomy & Management in Prison Nursing" application was developed and demonstrated satisfactory evaluation regarding both content and semantics, showing good adaptation to the proposed criteria and high internal consistency among the items.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.