Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41980090›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2026

Resource Use in Introductory Biology: Evaluating Latent Patterns, Demographic Covariates, and Effects on Final Course Grade.

Maryrose Weatherton, Melissa Aikens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maryrose WeathertonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.
Melissa AikensDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introductory science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses critically shape students' academic trajectories, but often present barriers that limit achievement and retention. Despite the abundance of resources intended to support students in these courses, little is known about how students differentially engage with them, and how patterns of engagement may relate to course outcomes and help-seeking behaviors more broadly. We examined resource use among 1944 students enrolled in introductory biology at seven U.S. universities. Latent class analysis identified four distinct profiles of engagement that varied in the frequency and type of resources used. Contrary to expectations, student characteristics (e.g., race, gender identity) were not strong predictors of profile membership. However, final course grade differed significantly among the profiles; students who reported frequent use of both social and material resources earned significantly lower grades than students in other profiles. These findings challenge assumptions that greater resource use universally supports academic success and instead suggest other factors, such as metacognition and course context, may be salient determinants of resource use behaviors and academic outcomes. This study offers novel insights into a modifiable aspect of student learning behavior, contributing to ongoing efforts to design more effective STEM learning experiences.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessBiologyLearningStudentsDemographyFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMetacognitionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41980090
PMCPMC13088199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.