ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2026
Effect of soft tissue sample preparation techniques for scanning small-angle X-ray scattering experiments.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scanning small-angle X-ray scattering (sSAXS) has found multiple applications as a technique to probe the nanostructure in soft tissues and pathologies thereof. However, fresh tissue is fragile and prone to the quick onset of decomposition and autolysis. It lacks the firmness required for uniform and thin sectioning, resulting in the loss of 2D resolution offered by focused X-ray beams, because the signal would be integrated through thick and/or irregular sections. Tissue processing, that includes fixation and embedding, is used to mitigate these issues but can by itself introduce structural changes in the tissues and impede the correct interpretation of sSAXS data. Here the extent of these structural changes in the SAXS signal caused by common tissue preservation methods on the example of skeletal muscle tissue, consisting of both muscle and surrounding connective tissue, was studied. This can guide an informed choice of preservation method tailored for specific experimental requirements. While some techniques performed better than others, all tissue-processing methods induced structural changes to a certain degree. The choice of preservation method is therefore a balance between sectioning requirements and type of tissue used, as well as targeted structural information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.