ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Attentional control as a double-edged sword: Distractor processing and its potential benefits in individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines whether individuals from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds would show greater conceptually based implicit priming from distracting information. In two experiments, we measured the conceptually based implicit priming of participants from lower-SES and higher-SES backgrounds using a category generation task (Experiment 1) and a general knowledge task (Experiment 2), each preceded by an incidental-encoding task (a color-naming Stroop task in Experiment 1 and a 1-back task involving pictures with irrelevant words superimposed in Experiment 2). The results showed that, regardless of whether it was the category generation task or the general knowledge task, participants in the lower-SES background group had higher conceptually based implicit priming scores. The research results indicate that participants from lower-SES backgrounds show greater conceptually based implicit priming from distracting information. Therefore, this finding may suggest that participants from lower-SES backgrounds process irrelevant information and use it to improve their performance on subsequent tasks. From the perspective of adaptive development, it offers a new viewpoint for further understanding the cognitive adaptations of attentional processing in individuals from lower-SES backgrounds when facing socioeconomic disadvantage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41979865What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.