Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41979854›Full record

ReviewBiological cybernetics2026

Contribution of spike timing to the neural code: from fast to slow timescales.

Stefano Panzeri, Nicola Marie Engel, Marco Celotto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological cybernetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefano PanzeriInstitute for Neural Information Processing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), 22527, Hamburg, Germany. s.panzeri@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-8909
Nicola Marie EngelInstitute for Neural Information Processing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), 22527, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-9530-1126
Marco CelottoInstitute for Neural Information Processing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), 22527, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0890-0703

Funding

European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme 101206609German Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF 01GQ2404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The publication of Mainen and Sejnowski's 1995 seminal paper strongly renewed interest in how spike timing contributes to the neural code. In the 3 decades since then, considerable experimental and theoretical research has investigated the timescales at which spike timing contributes to the neural code. Here we review theoretical and experimental research of the last 30 years aimed at defining conceptually and measuring operationally these timescales. By a critical review of the literature, we individuate six broad classes of timescales that have been conceptualized and operationalized: the maximal temporal precision of spiking that a neuron can achieve, the encoding time window (the time window containing the information-bearing spike times), the encoding timescale (the coarsest time resolution for measuring spikes without losing information), the maximal discrimination precision timescale (the smallest spike time difference that can be discriminated behaviorally), the encoding-readout intersection timescale (the maximal timing precision at which stimulus information encoded in neural activity is also actually read out to inform behavior), and the information consistency timescale (measuring the stability of information encoding over time). Together, this work has revealed short and long timescales that influence information coding and affect behavior. Short encoding timescales, from milliseconds to tens of milliseconds, are useful for sensory information encoding and perception. Long consistency timescales, ranging from hundreds of milliseconds to seconds, are useful for accumulating evidence and stabilizing decisions.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAnimalsHumansTime FactorsInformation codingSensory codingSpike timing

Identifiers

PMID41979854
PMCPMC13079490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.