Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41979822›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Estimation of histopathological types from breast MRI findings using a large language model.

Rie Kanasaki, Kazufumi Suzuki, Takami Ota, Sadako Akashi-Tanaka, Yoji Nagashima, Shuji Sakai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rie KanasakiDivision of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan. kanasaki.rie@twmu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4308-0746
Kazufumi SuzukiDivision of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Takami OtaDivision of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Sadako Akashi-TanakaDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoji NagashimaDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuji SakaiDivision of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLarge language models (LLMs) may hold the potential to infer pathological diagnoses from imaging findings such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This retrospective study investigates whether an LLM can accurately predict histopathological types of breast lesions based on descriptive findings in contrast-enhanced breast MRI reports written in natural language.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed findings from diagnostic imaging reports of consecutive cases of contrast-enhanced breast MRI performed between January and December 2024. Textual descriptions of imaging findings were entered into an LLM (OpenAI o3), and its predictions of histopathological types were compared with the actual pathological diagnoses.

resultsA total of 186 lesions from 180 patients were classified into 10 histopathological types, including lesions with combinations of these types. The LLM o3 generated predictions for eight of these types. For the most prevalent type, invasive ductal carcinoma (123 lesions), the model achieved 83.7% sensitivity, 60.8% specificity, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 76.9%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 70.6%. For the second-most frequent type, ductal carcinoma in situ (38 lesions), the model achieved 57.9% sensitivity, 89.6% specificity, PPV of 56.4%, and NPV of 90.2%.

conclusionThe latest LLM accurately inferred invasive ductal carcinoma with typical breast MRI findings, supporting the hypothesis that LLMs can predict histopathological types based on imaging descriptions.

Indexed as

Breast cancerDuctal carcinoma in situInvasive ductal carcinomaLarge language model

Identifiers

PMID41979822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.