ArticleDrug safety2026
Sexual Dysfunction with Antipsychotics: Emerging Clues from a Disproportionality Analysis of the World Health Organization VigiBase.
Article in Drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAntipsychotic-associated sexual adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are well known in clinical practice, although efforts to understand differences between antipsychotics and distinct types of sexual ADRs are limited.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess and prioritize the profile of each antipsychotic regarding sexual ADRs reporting, and to account for potential confounders.
methodsWe used VigiBase
resultsWe included 5195 cases of antipsychotic-related sexual ADRs (43.1% serious, median time to onset of 61 days, 36.1% physician-reported). Several SDRs emerged in males (erectile dysfunction [3487 reports; ROR 2.49, 95% CI 2.40-2.57]; priapism [2372 reports; ROR 15.55, 95% CI 14.82-16.32]) and females (decreased libido [373 reports; ROR 1.61, 95% CI 1.46-1.79]) for all antipsychotic classes, except for muscarinic antagonists in females (ROR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55-0.73; IC - 0.65, 95% CI - 0.86 to - 0.45). In both sexes, the highest number of reports were for risperidone, aripiprazole and olanzapine. The SDRs disappeared in the sensitivity analysis including only non-serious cases and cases with co-reported hyperprolactinemia. Sexual ADRs for all antipsychotics were classified as of moderate priority, with the exception of fluspirilene (low priority).
conclusionsNotwithstanding limitations, including inability to infer causality, these findings raise the hypothesis that sexual ADRs could be a class effect of antipsychotics, yet possibly reversible, in both women and men. REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered to the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/96eq7 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41979819What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.