Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41979809›Full record

SynthesisJournal of immigrant and minority health2026

Ethical Conduct of Research with Migrants and Refugees: A Systematic Qualitative Review of Ethics Guidelines.

Rajshree Thapa, Davoud Pourmarzi, Sarah Cherian, Christine Phillips, Margaret Kay, Ian Pieper, Raylynn Benn, Chiedza Malunga, Thomas Volkman, Holly Seale and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rajshree ThapaEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, 3128, Melbourne, Australia.
Davoud PourmarziNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Sarah CherianDepartment of Refugee and Global Health and General Paediatrics, Perth Childrens Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Christine PhillipsSchool of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Margaret KayGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Ian PieperEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, 3128, Melbourne, Australia.
Raylynn BennSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Chiedza MalungaMigrant and Refugee Health Partnership, New South Wales, Australia.
Thomas VolkmanDepartment of Refugee and Global Health and General Paediatrics, Perth Childrens Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Holly SealeSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Budiadi SudartoAnanda Training and Consultancy, Melbourne, Australia.
Bryan MukandiSchool of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Jacqueline BoyleEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, 3128, Melbourne, Australia. jacqueline.boyle@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing consensus across communities, health and social care practitioners and researchers in Australia of the need for specific ethical guidelines for research with migrants and refugees. We aim to identify existing documents providing ethics guidance for research with people from migrant and refugee communities, to appraise their quality, synthesise recommendations and identify gaps where additional guidance is required. This systematic review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), 2020 guidelines. Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II was used to assess the quality of guidelines. Data sources include OVID Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Google Scholar from the database until June 2025. We identified 18 guidelines that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The six principles identified to meet the specific needs of research with people from migrant and refugee communities were: (i) non-maleficence, the principle of “do no harm”; (ii) empowerment and community participation; (iii) social, health and scientific value of the research; (iv) respect for rights and dignity; (v) cultural sensitivity; and (vi) informed consent. The guidance documents were primarily focused on non-maleficence (avoiding the harms of research) rather than inclusive and collaborative research practices. There was insufficient information available in each guideline to evaluate quality across the different domains of the AGREE II. There are limited comprehensive, good-quality ethics guidelines for research with migrant and refugee communities. There is a clear opportunity to develop with communities, authoritative guidance that incorporates relevant recommendations from existing guidelines, addressing gaps noted, and includes implementation plans.Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42024473285.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchGuidelines as TopicRefugeesTransients and MigrantsAustraliaCultural CompetencyHumansInformed ConsentQualitative ResearchEthicsGuidelinesMigrantsRefugeeResearch

Identifiers

PMID41979809
PMCPMC13222319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.