ArticleOdontology2026
Impact of moderate to heavy occlusal forces and tooth wear on interproximal caries prevalence in posterior teeth.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cross sectional analytical study evaluated whether clinical indicators of occlusal forces are associated with the prevalence of interproximal caries in posterior teeth. A total of 403 posterior teeth from 109 patients (12-70 years) attending Mashhad Dental School were examined. Dental facets, non carious cervical lesions, occlusion type, and contact position were recorded as clinical indicators of occlusal forces, and interproximal caries was assessed clinically and radiographically using ICDAS II criteria. Caries risk status was determined using the CAMBRA system. The association between dental facets and interproximal caries was analyzed using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression, and multilevel logistic regression with teeth nested within subjects to account for clustering. Models were adjusted for gender, plaque presence, occlusion type, and contact position. Dental facets were present in 72.5% of examined teeth, and interproximal caries in 32.5%. Teeth with facets showed a higher prevalence of interproximal caries than teeth without facets (38.7% vs. 16.2%). The presence of facets was strongly associated with interproximal caries in both standard and multilevel models (adjusted odds ratio approximately 3.0; 95% confidence interval roughly 1.7-5.6; p < 0.001). This association persisted across subgroups defined by plaque presence and occlusion type, whereas plaque, occlusion type, contact position, and gender were not independently associated with caries. Teeth with facets were also found in patients with a greater number of extracted teeth. Within the limitations of this cross sectional study, clinical indicators of increased occlusal forces, particularly dental facets, were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of interproximal caries in posterior teeth. These findings support the hypothesis that biomechanical factors may contribute to the development of interproximal caries in addition to traditional biological and behavioral risk factors, but they do not establish a causal relationship. Assessment of occlusal indicators such as wear facets may help identify patients at increased risk of interproximal caries and could be incorporated into caries risk evaluation and preventive planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41979796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.