ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Association of Preferred Language and Race with Perioperative Oral Midazolam Administration in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerioperative anxiety is common in pediatric patients, contributing to increased morbidity and postoperative dissatisfaction. While behavioral management techniques (BMT) are preferred, midazolam is often used when BMT is not feasible. Language barriers and racial disparities may influence healthcare delivery. This study examines the impact of English fluency and race on midazolam administration in pediatric patients,
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed pediatric anesthesia cases from a single medical center between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021. It included patients aged 1 to 12 years undergoing outpatient procedures. Demographic variables such as age, sex, weight, race, ASA physical status, and preferred language were collected. Patients were classified as English-Proficient (EP) or Limited English Proficiency (LEP) speakers. The primary outcome was oral midazolam administration. Oral midazolam was selected because it reflects the pre-induction anxiolysis decision made prior to IV placement and parental separation, which is the clinical context most relevant to behavioral management strategies and communication barriers. Although intravenous midazolam administration is available and captured in the electronic medical record, it is typically administered after IV access has been established or intraoperatively and does not represent the same preoperative decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41979789What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.