ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026
Automatic monitoring of single-wall MAPSE by transesophageal echocardiography for tracking global left ventricular function irrespective of regional hypokinesia: a secondary analysis.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) serially in a single wall may be an effective method for monitoring global left ventricular (LV) function, especially when automated with a novel deep learning method using transesophageal echocardiography, called autoMAPSE. However, this assumption is untested in postoperative ICU patients, and the impact of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) is unclear.
aimTo assess the ability of single-wall autoMAPSE in tracking changes in global LV function (i.e., trending ability) using manual global MAPSE averaged from four walls as reference, and to explore how this ability was affected by RWMA.
methodsThis study was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. The changes in single-wall autoMAPSE and manual global MAPSE were calculated in 49 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Trending ability evaluates how well a novel method detects changes in a reference method, which we assessed using four-quadrant plots with concordance rates. To explore the effects of RWMA, we classified RWMA by temporal behavior (persistent or dynamic) and by location relative to single-wall autoMAPSE (same or remote wall), yielding four patterns for analysis of trending ability: (i) remote wall, dynamic RWMA, (ii) remote wall, persistent RWMA, (iii) same wall, dynamic RWMA, and (iv) same wall, persistent RWMA.
resultsOverall, single-wall autoMAPSE had adequate trending ability (concordance rate 91%). All LV walls showed adequate trending ability (concordance rate ≥ 90%), except for the septal wall (concordance rate 88%). The effect of RWMA was negligible, as the concordance rates of the four patterns ranged from 89 to 96%.
conclusionsIn this secondary analysis, single-wall autoMAPSE tracked changes in global LV function in 9 out of 10 cases, irrespective of RWMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.