ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Comparison of As, Cd, Cu, Fe, and Pb levels in dry cat foods containing different protein sources (poultry, fish, red meat) and in cats consuming these diets.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heavy metals are an important source of environmental contamination and can enter the pet food chain through animal-derived protein ingredients and drinking water. Owing to their obligate carnivorous nature and strong reliance on animal-based proteins, cats may be exposed to diet-related potentially toxic metals. It was aimed to compare arsenic, cadmium, copper, iron, and lead concentrations in commercial dry cat foods (n = 300) formulated with different primary protein sources (poultry, fish, and red meat), and to investigate potential toxic effects in relation to protein source and duration of dietary exposure. Cats (n = 750) were grouped according to dietary protein source and feeding duration. Heavy metal concentrations were determined in cat foods, household drinking water, serum, and hair samples using ICP-OES. Cadmium concentrations were significantly higher in fish- and red meat–based diets compared with poultry-based diets; copper and iron concentrations were higher in poultry-based diets. All measured metal concentrations remained below established regulatory limits in diets. In biological samples, no consistent accumulation was observed according to protein source or feeding duration. Cats fed poultry-based diets exhibited higher blood copper and iron concentrations and lower blood lead levels compared with other groups; however, all values remained within physiological reference ranges. Hair metal concentrations did not differ significantly among dietary groups. Heavy metal concentrations measured in the evaluated diets were generally within suggested guidelines. Although copper concentrations exceeded recommended limits by FEDIAF in some diets, this wasn’t associated with clinically relevant accumulation in cats. Given the observational and cross-sectional nature of the study, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and do not exclude the possibility of long-term accumulation or risk associated with chronic exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.