ArticleFood science of animal resources2026
Technological and molecular profiling of lactic flora in Hamra ewe's milk cheese from the Algerian steppe.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the technological and functional characteristics of indigenous lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from Hamra ewe’s milk cheese, a traditional semi-refined product from the steppe region of western Algeria. The objective was to identify, characterize, and evaluate the acidifying, proteolytic, and texturizing potential of dominant LAB species contributing to cheese typicity. Thirty-two isolates were obtained and screened using morphological, biochemical, and molecular (multiplex PCR and 16 S rRNA sequencing) methods. Four dominant species were identified: Lactococcus lactis, L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis, Enterococcus faecium, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Acidification assays revealed that Lactococcus strains were the most active acidifiers, producing 11 to 12.8 g/L of lactic acid with final pH values between 4.17 and 4.36 after 24 h. E. faecium exhibited moderate acidification (9.7 g/L; pH 4.42), while L. acidophilus produced lower acidity (7.2 g/L; pH 4.81). Growth and tolerance tests confirmed adaptation to wide temperature (6 to 55 °C), pH (2.3 to 7.3), and NaCl (1 to 6%) ranges. Coagulation and proteolytic tests indicated that Lactococcus strains ensured rapid milk coagulation (12 h; viscosity 810–980 cP), whereas E. faecium and L. acidophilus displayed notable proteolytic activity, forming lysis zones of 7 to 14 mm. L. acidophilus also produced exopolysaccharides (up to 7.2 g/L on day 10), enhancing texture and firmness. The coordinated microbial succession during fermentation and ripening confirmed the technological potential of these indigenous LAB. Their use as natural starter or adjunct cultures can enhance the sensory quality, authenticity, and typicity of traditional Algerian ewe’s milk cheeses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.