ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Deep learning for carotid Doppler spectra classification.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a global health challenge, with limited specialist access in low- and middle-income countries hindering early detection. Carotid Doppler ultrasound offers promise for screening in non-specialist settings. However, spectral Doppler lacks the anatomical context provided by duplex ultrasound, making it challenging to determine which carotid vessel is being assessed. This study focuses on accurately identifying signals from the common, internal, and external carotid arteries (CCA, ICA, and ECA) based solely on Doppler spectra. This forms a critical step for subsequent disease classification. A clinical study enrolled 398 participants who underwent bilateral carotid Doppler examination (198 healthy controls, 200 with CVD). Several classifiers were evaluated including i) five deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) utilizing transfer learning on spectral images, and ii) conventional machine learning classifiers applied to the maximum frequency envelope and extracted features. The best performing classifier was a CNN (GoogLeNet) which achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.929, effectively distinguishing between carotid artery segments. It exhibited f1-scores of 0.830, 0.803 and 0.764 for the ICA, ECA and CCA, respectively. Explainable AI tools (GradCAM and LIME) provide intuitive visual insights into these predictions. This study addresses a previously unsolved problem of automated carotid artery segment identification using spectral Doppler waveforms alone. When incorporated into automated screening tools, this approach provides a low-cost, specialist-independent pathway for earlier CVD detection, particularly suited to resource-constrained environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.