Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41979719›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

The time-intensity uncertainty principle in vision.

Robert C G Johansson, Karin M Bausenhart, Rolf Ulrich, Paul Kelber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert C G JohanssonDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, Tübingen, 72076, Germany. johansson@psycho.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0406-5517
Karin M BausenhartDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
Rolf UlrichDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
Paul KelberDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 381713393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between time perception and brightness perception remains poorly understood. Here we present a computational account linking the two domains, grounded in established principles of neural information processing in visual cortex. A nonlinear transducer maps luminance to population spike rate, while correlated gain fluctuations impose an upper bound on achievable signal-to-noise ratios. Perceptual magnitudes in both domains are decoded from the same spike-count statistics, yielding a reciprocal trade-off in perceptual resolution: brighter stimuli improve temporal precision but impair brightness sensitivity, whereas longer stimuli enhance brightness sensitivity but degrade temporal resolution. We tested this conjectured trade-off in two psychophysical experiments manipulating stimulus duration and luminance. Model predictions closely matched the behavioral data, revealing a fundamental coding limit in vision: the time-intensity uncertainty principle. This limit provides a unified explanation for near-miss relations to Weber's law for time perception and intensity perception, Bloch-like temporal summation effects governing brightness discrimination sensitivity, and luminance-dependent shifts in duration discrimination sensitivity.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityTime PerceptionVisual PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalHumansPattern Recognition, VisualPsychophysicsUncertaintyVisual CortexBrightness perceptionSensory processingTime perceptionUncertainty principleVisual psychophysics

Identifiers

PMID41979719
PMCPMC13079518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.