ArticleClinical neuroradiology2026
Initial Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Anchoring Exchange Device: AI-based Quantitative Distal Tip-Motion Analysis.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time AI-Generated Guidewire-Out-of-View Notifications in Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: Higher Observed Rates Among Trainees.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Bailout Guiding Catheter Exchange Using Medilizer: A Case Report.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeExchange maneuvers during intracranial angioplasty and stent deployment can cause unintended distal tip motion, potentially leading to vessel injury. We evaluated a novel anchoring exchange device (Medilizer; Medikit, Tokyo, Japan), a 320-cm 0.014-inch wire with a retrievable self-expanding stent at the distal tip, designed to stabilize the distal position during exchange maneuvers and approved for clinical use in Japan.
methodsWe compared exchange maneuvers using conventional wires with those using a Medilizer during angioplasty of intracranial stenosis performed at three institutions. Biplane fluoroscopic sequences (frontal and lateral views) were analyzed using an AI-assisted tracking system to quantify the trajectory length of distal tip motion in each view.
resultsSeventeen consecutive procedures (10 conventional wire cases and 7 Medilizer cases) were included. In one Medilizer case, the distal tip was outside the field of view in one projection, which was excluded from the analysis. Consequently, 20 conventional wire and 13 Medilizer views were analyzed. The trajectory length of the distal tip was significantly shorter with the Medilizer than with conventional wires (3.3 ± 1.5 mm vs. 35.9 ± 20.0 mm; p < 0.001), corresponding to an approximately 90% reduction. No adverse events occurred in any of the 17 procedures.
conclusionEven in this initial cohort, the magnitude of improvement in distal tip motion strongly suggests clinically meaningful stability advantages of this anchoring exchange device. Furthermore, AI-assisted quantitative evaluation can provide an objective measure of endovascular device performance, warranting further validation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41979663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.