Trial report in Blood cancer discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00801489 (A Phase 2 Study of Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Filgrastim-sndz,Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin and Idarubicin in Newly Diagnosed Core Binding Factor Associated Acute Myelogenous Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Study of Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Filgrastim-sndz,Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin and Idarubicin in Newly Diagnosed Core Binding Factor Associated Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2007 to 2028Enrolled270ConditionsAcute Myeloid Leukemia With Inv(16)(p13.1q22), CBFB-MYH11, Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(16, 16)(p13.1ArmsCytarabine, Decitabine, Filgrastim-sndz, Fludarabine Phosphate, Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Jayastu SenapatiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-6831-2567
Hagop M KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-3307
Edward AyoubDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-1321-0114
Andres E QuesadaDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-7828
Sanam LoghaviDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8980-3202
Koji SasakiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-0610
Tapan M KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-9832
Naval DaverDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7103-373X
Courtney D DiNardoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9003-0390
Akhil JainDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7298-4246
Mikaela McCabeDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0009-0004-3223-0342
Fadi G HaddadDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9702-8485
Mark BrandtDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0009-0008-8982-3519
Guilin TangSection of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9482-4806
Yesid AlvaradoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-1652-7937
Kayla FarishDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0009-0005-3936-2097
Hussein A AbbasDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-2946-3562
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-2482
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-377X
Michael AndreeffDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-1144-1958
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7679-6453
Funding
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer SPORE-LeukemiaP50CA100632 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHPALL, ELIZABETH J · 2003 to 2023
$43.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA100632University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MD Anderson) C1100632University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MD Anderson) CA016672
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Fludarabine, cytarabine, and G-CSF-based therapy (FLAG) yields approximately 60% 5-year overall survival (OS) in core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with potential added benefit with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). Although measurable residual disease (MRD) status via optimal quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) response (OPR; qPCR <0.1% at the end of induction and <0.01% during/after consolidation) of fusion transcripts predicts survival, the impact of baseline myeloid mutations on OPR and survival with FLAG remains uncertain. We interrogated these factors in 219 first-line patients with CBF-AML (median age 52 years; range, 19-80) treated on a phase II trial (NCT00801489); 51% received FLAG-GO and 49% FLAG idarubicin. Baseline mutations included 49% kinase pathways (non-MAP kinase), 44% MAP kinase, 11% DNMT3A-ASXL1-TET2, and 7% transcription factors. Five-year relapse-free survival and OS were 67% and 74% overall, respectively, 77% and 80% with FLAG-GO. On multivariate analysis, baseline mutations did not affect OPR or survival, whereas FLAG-GO favored both. In CBF-AML, FLAG-based therapy possibly attenuates the prognostic impact of concurrent baseline genomics. SIGNIFICANCE: In CBF-AML treated with conventional intensive chemotherapy, usually 7 + 3, baseline mutations in KIT, chromatin modulators, cohesin complex, etc., garner suboptimal MRD clearance and survival. In our analysis, FLAG-based therapy abrogated the impact of baseline mutations on OPR and survival in CBF-AML, while showing promising long-term survival using FLAG-GO.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Integrated Analysis of Genomics, Molecular Responses, and Outcomes of CBF-AML with FLAG-Based Therapy on a Phase II Trial. · full record | OpenQuestion