ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2026
Interference-Limited Absorption in Dense Molecular Nanolayers Near Reflecting Surfaces.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigate linear resonant absorption by a dense ensemble of molecules confined to a sub-wavelength layer in two geometries: (i) a free-standing film in a homogeneous space and (ii) the same film placed at a controlled distance from a reflecting surface. In both cases, increasing the effective light-matter coupling (via molecular density/oscillator strength) produces a nonmonotonic response: absorption rises to an optimum and then decreases as the film becomes increasingly radiatively bright and reflective. Finite-difference time-domain simulations and analytical transfer-matrix calculations agree quantitatively and yield compact ridge conditions for the optimum. We interpret the trends using a scattering/port picture: the isolated film is a symmetric two-port system (reflection and transmission), which bounds single-sided resonant absorption to ≤50% in the ultrathin limit (reflecting transition saturation), whereas adding a mirror suppresses transmission and converts the structure into an effectively one-port absorber. In the mirror-backed geometry, interference can cancel reflection, and unity absorption is obtained at critical coupling, when radiative leakage is balanced by intrinsic molecular loss. These results clarify fundamental limits and design rules for collective absorption in dense molecular layers near dielectric or metallic boundaries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.