Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41979387›Full record

SynthesisOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2026

Canal Cholesteatoma Presentation and Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Angelica M Walker, Matthew Cheung, Shaun A Nguyen, Kate Bonham, Erin A Harvey, Robert F Labadie, Ted A Meyer

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angelica M WalkerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-7278
Matthew CheungDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4888-9382
Shaun A NguyenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0664-4571
Kate BonhamDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0556-0346
Erin A HarveyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-3371
Robert F LabadieDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0541-4336
Ted A MeyerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-3897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate current understanding of external auditory canal cholesteatoma (EACC), its symptomatic burden, clinical features, diagnostic approach, and management strategies to reduce delays in diagnosis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, COCHRANE Library, and SCOPUS. REVIEW

methodsA comprehensive literature search was completed in March 2025. The search identified 2117 English-language articles, of which 30 studies reported patients diagnosed with EACC. Meta-analyses of mean difference (Δ), proportions (%), and continuous measures with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed using random and fixed effects models.

resultsA total of 1007 patients were included with a mean age of 43.9 years (range 6-89). Most were diagnosed with Stage III EACC (60.7%, CI 43.5-76.7). Nicotine use (33.1%, CI 15.2-54.1) and cotton swab abuse (24.3%, CI 16.7-33.7) were common risk factors. Patients most often presented with otalgia (39.9%, CI 30.5-49.7) or otorrhea (50.3%, CI 37.8-62.7), though 15.7% (CI 4.5-31.6) were asymptomatic. Conservative treatment with serial debridement was used in most patients (69.6%, CI 44.5-89.7). Canalplasty (68.6%, CI 48.3-85.7), tympanoplasty (24.7%, CI 3.7-56.1), and mastoidectomy (33.7%, CI 17.4-52.3) were the most common surgical approaches. Recurrence was low (4.5%; 95% CI 2.3-8.0).

conclusionPatients with EACC are frequently diagnosed at advanced stages. Recognizing risk factors and symptoms can expedite detection and guide management. This review highlights how tailored interventions achieve low recurrence rates and reduce morbidity linked to delayed diagnosis.

Indexed as

CholesteatomaEar CanalEar DiseasesHumanscanal cholesteatomacholesteatomaEACCexternal auditory canal cholesteatoma

Identifiers

PMID41979387
PMCPMC13327464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.