Trial reportAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia2026
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Intrathecal Morphine and Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery with Midline Sternotomy: An Open Label Randomized Control Trial.
Trial report in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsIntrathecal morphine (ITM) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) decrease postoperative pain in standard cardiac surgery. In this study, we compared the analgesic efficacy of ITM and B/L ESPB in patients undergoing open heart surgeries.
methodsAfter approval from the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent from patients scheduled for open heart surgeries, they were randomized into two groups: Group ITM patients received ITM (5 mcg/kg), whereas Group ESPB patients received bilateral ESP block (0.3 mL/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine on either side). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative fentanyl consumption during the first 24 hours of ICU stay after extubation. Secondary outcomes were postoperative VAS at rest and on cough during the first 24 hours, pre- and postoperative pulmonary function, and number of rescue analgesics. Quantitative variables were presented as mean (SD) or median (IQR). Categorical variables were expressed as numbers or percentages. Spirometry variables were compared over time between the groups using Friedman test.
resultsThe ITM group had significantly less median fentanyl consumption compared to the ESPB group during the first 24 hours postoperative period [0 (0-75) μg vs. 234 (160-336) μg (95% CI, 171.65, 255.38); P < 0.001]. The VAS score at rest and during cough was significantly better in the ITM group. FEV1 and FVC reduced postoperatively in both groups with significantly better values in the ITM group.
conclusionITM administered prior to induction provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to bilateral ESPB in patients undergoing open-heart surgery. It significantly reduces opioid requirements, improves patient satisfaction, and enhances postoperative pulmonary function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.