ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Is a Clinical Trial With a Non-Bioequivalent Batch Necessary? The Critical Role of Intrasubject Variability in Olaparib Formulation Bridging by PBPK.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is increasingly being used to support oral drug formulation bridging, the acceptance by regulatory agencies is low. One of the primary concerns is the absence of clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data from a non-bioequivalent (non-BE) batch during model validation. Such data are strongly recommended by regulatory agencies to demonstrate that the models are sufficiently sensitive to detect formulation-driven changes in drug exposure. Herein, we investigated whether using clinical non-BE batch data is the most effective absorption model validation approach, using the bridging of adult and pediatric olaparib formulations as an example. Two olaparib PBPK models were developed: a "final" model and a "counterpart" model, each with comparable ability to predict the olaparib PK. Both models well predicted the clinical PK of a non-BE batch of 250 mg olaparib-manufactured intentionally with a slower release profile-and its lack of bioequivalence relative to ten 25 mg tablets, formulated for faster release, as a conservative scenario. The final model closely captured both observed intra- and intersubject variabilities in C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.