ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026
Quantifying Population Reversibility of Sensor Performance in Multi-Cycle Single-Sensor Recovery Assay.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative chemical imaging requires sensors that reliably recover across repeated exposures. While solution-phase bulk measurements provide an averaged response of the sensor population, imaging at the single-sensor level enables mapping of biological processes with spatiotemporal resolution, revealing localized events and interaction sites. To translate such imaging into calibrated measurements, sensor variability across repeated analyte exposures must be analyzed. This work introduces a generic workflow that combines an automated microfluidic flow imaging platform with systematic characterization of the response, recovery, and reversibility of individual nanosensors under multi-cycle challenges. For representative implementation, three near-infrared fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) sensor models are tested, each with a distinct functionalization rendering it optically responsive to a corresponding exemplar target: dopamine, thiocholine, or serotonin. While first-cycle responses averaged over the entire field of view recapitulate ensemble calibration, single-sensor analysis uncovers broad heterogeneity in response magnitude, signal recovery, and reversibility across hundreds of individual SWCNTs under repeated exposure and wash cycles. To compare performance across cycles, a standardized Population Reversibility Score based on Kullback-Leibler Divergence is introduced, condensing response distributions into a single cycle- and concentration-dependent, quantitative metric. This framework is generally applicable to other sensor-analyte systems with transient readouts, guiding optimization for spatiotemporal analyte mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.