ArticleEuropean stroke journal2026
Too noisy, too dark: sleep environment at a typical stroke unit.
Article in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSleep-wake disorders are common after stroke and negatively affect stroke outcome. Environmental factors such as noise and light exposure can perturb sleep quality and destabilise circadian rhythm. This study aimed to quantify light and noise exposure of hospitalised patients in a stroke unit and assessed compliance with recommended guidelines. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween July and August 2021, noise and light levels were measured in the former stroke unit of the Inselspital Bern. Noise exposure was assessed via the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level (LAeq), light exposure was assessed using melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance.
resultsWorld Health Organization recommended noise levels (30 dB at night and 35 dB during the day) were constantly exceeded. Door beds were significantly noisier than window beds during evenings (53 ± 3.3 dB vs 48.6 ± 3.5 dB) and during nighttime (43.4 ± 4.0 dB vs 39.5 ± 4.5 dB). Minimal daytime illuminance of 250 lx melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance was hardly ever reached at door beds (15 ± 30 min) but was reached for about 3 h throughout the day at window beds (186 ± 108 min). The highest quantity of illuminance was reached during late evening hours (18-22 h) for both window and door beds rather than in the mornings (6-10 h). DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThese observations suggest that the setting of monitored stroke units is unfavourable for sleep because of insufficient light and excessive noise exposure. Further studies are needed to confirm this observation and assess the associated effects on sleep-wake functions and stroke outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.