ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2026
Mitotic reactivation and transcriptional bursting govern transcriptional noise in the early Drosophila embryo.
Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stable epigenetic states set single-cell activation thresholds in mammalian expression systems.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Isogenic cells often exhibit variability in gene expression. Because of its stochastic nature, transcription is thought to lie at the heart of gene expression variability. While beneficial in some contexts, this transcriptional noise must be dampened to ensure the deployment of accurate gene expression programs. Here, we have investigated how the cis-regulatory code affects inter-nuclear variability in transcription, quantified at the level of individual RNA Polymerase II initiation events. Combining quantitative imaging in Drosophila embryos with mathematical modeling, we discovered that transcriptional noise is time dependent with two major components: mitotic exit and transcriptional bursting. Transcriptional noise peaks after mitosis due to the stochastic timing of postmitotic reactivation and the temporal heterogeneity of transcriptional bursting. When a steady-state regime is reached, transcriptional noise is then primarily driven by the kinetics of bursting. We demonstrate that the TATA box is necessary and sufficient to generate transcriptional noise, and assess the contribution of shadow enhancers to noise. Our work reveals the major contribution of the first polymerase passage after mitotic exit to transcriptional noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.