ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026
Advancing Systemic Risk Assessment for Complex, Interdependent Systems: A Research Agenda.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Engineering risk assessment has traditionally focused on direct impacts to individual assets or systems. However, as society's most notable risks increasingly stem from complex, interdependent systems, conventional methods fail to capture the cascading consequences and deepening uncertainty. Addressing this gap requires developing or extending assessment methods. To guide such development and align research efforts, this paper introduces a taxonomy of risk assessment methods. The taxonomy classifies methods by their capability to assess different types of consequences and systemic behaviors. Tier 1 methods can assess direct, localized impacts; Tier 2 methods also capture cascading consequences in interconnected systems; Tier 3 methods also address emergent, transformative, and uncertain dynamics. We identify key system and knowledge characteristics that challenge existing methods and outline research priorities necessary to advance systemic risk assessment: Analyzing consequences, structuring uncertainty, evaluating trade-offs, strengthening causal inference, ensuring defensibility, and communicating results. This agenda aims to guide future research towards risk assessment methods suitable for the systemic risk challenges society increasingly faces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.