ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2026
Noise2Noise Diffusion for Thin-Slice Brain CT Denoising without Clean Training Data.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thin-slice and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) computed tomography (CT) images usually suffer from excessive noise due to limited radiation dose being distributed into small detector units. In the context of deep learning-based image denoising, it is challenging to obtain clean training data from real patients for thin-slice CT because it is unethical to apply excessively high doses to the patients. Supervised learning with noise insertion would face unmatched noise models and possibly domain shift of the training data, which leads to deteriorated model performance. In this work, we proposed a novel method that combined the diffusion model with Noise2Noise, which achieved high-quality noise reduction without requiring clean training data. A conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic model (cDDPM) was trained to sample a CT slice from its two adjacent slices. Because of the noise independence between the input and target, DDPM would sample another noise realization of the target slice. During the inference, the trained DDPM was sampled multiple times to acquire multiple samples of the target slice, which were averaged for a slice with lower noise. The method was validated with simulated thin-slice brain CTs, demonstrating improved quantitative metrics and visual impressions compared to Noise2Noise UNet and supervised DDPM with a slightly mismatched noise model. The mean absolute errors (MAE) of the brain tissues were 4.12, 3.27, and 2.62 for Noise2Noise UNet, supervised DDPM, and the proposed method, respectively. The perceptual loss (LPIPS) was 0.0917, 0.0635, and 0.0422 for the three methods, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.