Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978901›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems : ACM GIS. ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems2025

Toward Foundation Models for Mobility Enriched Geospatially Embedded Objects.

Maria Despoina Siampou, Shang-Ling Hsu, Shushman Choudhury, Neha Arora, Cyrus Shahabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems : ACM GIS. ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. ICAD: A Self-Supervised Autoregressive Approach for Multi-Context Anomaly Detection in Human Mobility Data.Proceedings of the ... ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems : ACM GIS. ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Despoina SiampouUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Shang-Ling HsuUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Shushman ChoudhuryGoogle Research, Mountain View, California, USA.
Neha AroraGoogle Research, Mountain View, California, USA.
Cyrus ShahabiUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

SCH: Wearables for Health and Disease Knowledge (W4H)R01LM014026 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SHAHABI, CYRUS · 2022 to 2025
$1.2M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in large foundation models (FMs) have enabled learning general-purpose representations in natural language, vision, and audio. Yet geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) still lacks widely adopted foundation models that generalize across tasks that require joint reasoning over geospatial objects and human mobility. Such tasks are crucial as mobility, along with satellite imagery, street view, and text, is a core modality for understanding the physical world. We argue that a key bottleneck is the absence of unified, general-purpose, and transferable representations for geospatially embedded objects (GEOs). Such objects include points, polylines, and polygons in geographic space, enriched with semantic context and critical for geospatial reasoning. Much current GeoAI research compares GEOs to tokens in language models, where patterns of human movement and spatiotemporal interactions yield contextual meaning similar to patterns of words in text. However, modeling GEOs introduces challenges fundamentally different from language, including spatial continuity, variable scale and resolution, temporal dynamics, and data sparsity. Moreover, privacy constraints and global variation in mobility further complicates modeling and generalization. This paper formalizes these challenges, identifies key representational gaps, and outlines research directions for building foundation models that learn behavior-informed, transferable representations of GEOs from large-scale human mobility data, as well as static contextual information such as points of interest, object shapes and spatio-temporal semantics.

Indexed as

foundation modelsGeoAIhuman mobilityrepresentation learningspatio-temporal modelingspatio-temporal reasoning

Identifiers

PMID41978901
PMCPMC13070354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.