ArticlePeerJ2026
Harbor porpoise distribution and habitat use in the Northern California Current over three decades.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the dynamic marine environment, mobile predators adapt their distribution and habitat use in alignment with regional biogeographic features that confer predictable prey resources. However, long-term changes in environmental conditions may challenge the resilience and persistence of regionally adapted populations. In this study, we investigated how densities of a marine predator, the harbor porpoise, vary relative to habitat characteristics and whether they respond to large-scale fluctuations in environmental conditions. Vessel-based visual surveys were conducted between 1992 and 2022 in the nearshore waters of the Northern California Current. We developed stock-specific density surface models to examine harbor porpoise distribution relative to environmental covariates and predict density over time. This enabled us to identify long-term, stable spatial hotspots, and evaluate inter-annual fluctuations in density relative to ocean basin-scale climate indices and annual upwelling phenology. Harbor porpoises exhibited stock-specific habitat preferences reflecting regional biogeography. Predicted densities were higher in shallow, nearshore waters, with closer proximity to capes and estuaries, and in response to intermittent upwelling. Harbor porpoise density within our nearshore study region was significantly higher during years with longer and stronger upwelling seasons, and lower during El Niño conditions. Taken together, these findings emphasize the importance of regionally guided population assessment and management, and careful consideration of the potential impacts of climate change and anthropogenic pressures on this sensitive nearshore species and the habitats they rely on in the Northern California Current.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.