ReviewMaedica2026
Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer: Narrative Review and Clinical Insights.
Review in Maedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identifying hereditary breast cancer is increasingly important, as germline pathogenic variants not only influence lifetime cancer risk but also guide surveillance, preventive strategies and targeted treatments. While breast cancer genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) remain central to hereditary breast and ovarian cancers, progress in cancer genetics has shifted clinical practice toward broader multigene testing approaches. Methods: We reviewed the recent literature on the molecular basis of hereditary breast cancer, current genetic testing strategies, guideline-based indications, and the psychological, ethical and social challenges of genetic risk disclosure. Results: Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multigene panels enable the efficient identification of high- and moderate-penetrance variants, supporting personalized screening, risk-reducing interventions and treatment selection, including eligibility for enzyme poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, clinical implementation remains limited by persistent barriers, such as variants of uncertain significance and unequal access to genetic counselling and testing services. Conclusions: Genetic testing is reshaping breast cancer care by bridging prevention and precision oncology. Improving access, strengthening counselling pathways and optimizing variant interpretation are essential steps to ensure that genomic advances translate into real-world clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.