ArticleMaedica2026
Death in Epilepsy: Ictogenic Vs. Cardiogenic Mechanisms and Immunoassays in Postmortem Interval Estimation - Case Report.
Article in Maedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epilepsy may cause sudden death. More scenarios are possible: sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), cardiac and non-cardiac mechanisms of death. This study presents the case history of a 57-year-old person known for epilepsy who experienced a final tonic-clonic seizures with ictal cardiorespiratory arrest shortly after hospital admission. The present study aimed to determine 1) the cause of death and possible mechanisms; and 2) reference values for immunoassays at 36.8-hour postmortem interval. Materials and methods: A full medico-legal autopsy was performed. Postmortem findings and a large panel of investigations are provided: anatomic pathology, pericardial chemistry investigations, forensic serology and toxicology. Immunoassays including sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with Western blotting for vinculin and enzyme-linked immunosorbent for cardiac TnT, vinculin and desmin were used to assess the postmortem interval. Results: Cause of death, mechanisms and medico-legal causality are debated. Autopsy findings and relevant investigations did not reveal a single identifiable cause of death incompatible with life. Even more, SUDEP appears improbable and status epilepticus not documented. An ictogenic cause of death with autogenous and cardiac mechanisms involvement, enhanced by concomitant conditioning factors, a severe metabolic acidosis, respiratory failure with impaired ventilation and extensive myocardial fibrosis appears more probable. SDS-PAGE with Western Blot was able to detect the native molecular band 117 kD of vinculin and three molecular products of degradation at 90 kD, 87 kD, 84 kD at 36,8-hour postmortem interval and therefore confirmed the postmortem interval, while ELISA detected cardiac TnT (178.85 pg/mL), vinculin (570.96 pg/mL) and desmin (565.77 pg/mL) in the skeletal muscle. Conclusions: This case highlights the important role played by medico-legal autopsy in death investigation in epilepsy. If for legal purpose causality is required, causes of death and conditioning factors are to be extensively investigated and connected. ELISA delivered benchmarks references at 36.8-hour postmortem interval and provided to be a valuable immunoassay method in estimation of postmortem interval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.