ArticleMaedica2026
Diagnostic Approach for Cricoid Cartilage Tumors.
Article in Maedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tumors of the cricoid cartilage are rare, with chondroma and chondrosarcoma being the most common histologic types. Clinical presentation is often insidious and symptoms usually appear when the lesion enlarges significantly or invades surrounding structures. Differentiating benign chondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma remains challenging due to overlapping imaging findings and nonspecific clinical presentation. Histopathological examination following biopsy remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Case presentation: We present the case of a middle-aged male patient with a posterior cricoid cartilage lesion in whom a transcervical biopsy was performed to obtain a definitive diagnosis while avoiding tracheostomy. This approach provided safe access to the tumor while preserving cricoid stability and laryngeal function and minimizing unnecessary morbidity. Imaging modalities, including ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, were used in combination with flexible endoscopy and intraoperative neuromonitoring to guide diagnostic and management decisions. Conclusions: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges associated with cricoid cartilage tumors and demonstrates that transcervical biopsy may represent a safe and effective diagnostic approach in selected cases. Careful preoperative planning and individualized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are essential for optimal management and functional preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.